Koopa, i still gotta agree with Train... i think pure talent Bush is the better back. Right now no question peterson is the clear cut number one. if you stand both these guys next to each other, 100% im not sure peterson can compare... but thats just me im not impressed w/ 40 times of a running back or other measureables when it comes to RB. To me its about game tape, and as ipressive a peterson was his whole career espescially his freshan year where he was phenominal, i think Bush at 250+ LBS with vision, hands, explosiveness, game speed, and work ethic is a better back.






Reply With Quote




Bookmarks