Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Hill leaders issue arena demands

          
   
   
    Bookmark and Share
  1. #1
    Top 30 Friday133's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    982

    Hill leaders issue arena demands

    Hill leaders issue arena demands

    Ask for $10 million for development, share of revenue, guarantee of jobs in meeting with Ravenstahl, Onorato
    Friday, April 06, 2007

    By Rich Lord, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

    Hill District business leaders and clergy want $10 million in development funding, a share of arena revenue and guaranteed jobs for minorities as part of a construction surge that includes a new venue for the Penguins.

    The demands were made in a proposed term sheet given to Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato at a meeting yesterday at Wesley Center African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church.

    Around 20 neighborhood leaders spent two hours behind closed doors with Mr. Ravenstahl, Mr. Onorato, state Sen. Jim Ferlo, state Rep. Jake Wheatley and city Councilwoman Tonya Payne.

    "What came out of today's meeting was an agreement to make sure there's a benefit" to the community, said Marimba Milliones, an organizer of the Greater Hill Coalition of Concerned Citizens.

    "I think it was a good step in the right direction, but we still need to arrive at a firm understanding between all parties of what the relationship between our government agencies, private interests and the Hill District will be."

    There was not unanimous agreement. Some of those attending the meeting said the terms didn't reflect a broad consensus.

    The proposed three-page term sheet would give an unspecified group or representative of the Hill a seat at the table with the city, county, Penguins and involved developers in talks on construction of the arena and revival of the surrounding area.

    As part of the development package, $10 million up front and an unspecified annual contribution for 30 years thereafter would "be directed to the Greater Hill District community's development interest." The term sheet doesn't specify who would control those funds.

    An unspecified percentage of the revenue from the new arena and surrounding development would be reinvested in the Hill. The developer would also have to fund a master planning process for "the entire Greater Hill District community."

    Thirty percent of all arena employees at each job level -- from unskilled laborers to supervisors, managers and executives -- would have to be "minorities of color." The 30 percent rule would also apply to construction and development jobs.

    "When people are working to rebuild their community that means a lot, especially to young people," said the Rev. Johnnie Monroe, pastor of Grace Memorial Presbyterian Church.

    An organization picked by the community would have the right to take title to city-owned or county-owned Hill land at no cost, provided it presented a development plan.

    "I think the important thing is that we came to a tangible agreement that respects the needs and agenda of the Hill District community," said Ms. Milliones, declining to discuss details.

    Supporters of the terms want elected officials to use their leverage to help get the Penguins and casino developer Don Barden to agree to them.

    The approach, though, didn't sit well with Ms. Payne, who said the terms were developed by a few people without the benefit of neighborhood meetings. She added that putting ambitious terms on the table without full community buy-in likely wouldn't work.

    "I really believe that the Penguins want to work with this community and want to be good neighbors," she said. "But you've got to give them a chance to do good in the community, not come in and say, 'Do one, two, three, or I'll knock you out.' "

    "It seemed like these groups were trying to position themselves to try to receive any kind of funds that's going to come into the area," said Pearlean Coleman, a Democratic Committee leader from the Lower Hill who attended the meeting.

    Mr. Wheatley, who supported the approach, said it's important to ensure that Hill leaders get control of some of the incoming development dollars associated with the $290 million arena and a hoped-for $350 million redevelopment of parts of the Lower Hill District.

    "We could have significant new dollars coming in to develop the Hill in a way that not only helps visitors, but the people who live here," he said. "Like we've always said, this is a new day for the Hill."

    Talks on the terms will now move to a smaller group including two representatives of the Hill, two from the mayor's office, two from county government and someone from the Sports & Exhibition Authority and the Urban Redevelopment Authority.

    "There were a lot of issues that, say, there wasn't consensus yet, but we want this [smaller] group to work them out," said Mr. Onorato.

    The end product should be a written "community benefits agreement," the mayor said.

    "Included in that ideally would be the specifics of community involvement," Mr. Ravenstahl said, adding that the Penguins and Mr. Barden would be invited to a future meeting. They were not represented yesterday.

    Mr. Barden, in his successful application for the city's lone slot machine casino license, said he'd pay $7.5 million a year toward arena financing, and help spur $350 million in new construction nearby. His casino is slated for the North Shore.
    Post-Gazette

    This seems kinda demanding to me. I would have thought this would have been covered during the negotiations for the arena itself.

  2. #2
    House of Steel
    Guest
    Darn City Politics. Everybody is getting too greedy already.

  3. #3
    #1 Hater of the other 30 SteelCityMan786's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hollidaysburg
    Posts
    2,493
    Hill District Leaders:We want a share of the arena revenue.

    Everyone else:Should have been part of the arena negotiations.

    The Hill District could have made their lives easier back in round 1 when the Penguins went to get an arena with Isle of Capri. But they made their lives harder and decided to go oh no, we don't want that here. If there was an open lot on the North Shore I'd tell the Pens go up that way because it looks like the Hill District is doing nothing but nagging till they get their way.

    The Hill District also forgets this, there is PLENTY of other things that are coming into that area once Mellon Arena is torn down if they decide to do so. They can get revenues from that.



  4. #4
    Prosdo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    7,185
    My Mood
    Addicted
    The Hill District needs to go to hell. They are getting ridiculous with their demands.


  5. #5
    SA Member #27
    Forged in Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,010
    My Mood
    falcons-hater
    Quote Originally Posted by Prosdo View Post
    The Hill District needs to go to hell. They are getting ridiculous with their demands.
    The Hill District is more like the Going Down Hill District!



  6. #6
    Tailgate Coordinator
    Stlrs4Life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    New Bedford, Pa.
    Posts
    3,956
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevie Steeler View Post
    The Hill District is more like the Going Down Hill District!


    Thus the show "Hill Street Blues"

    I'm A "Champion"

  7. #7
    BlitzburghRockCity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Central PA.
    Posts
    54,682
    My Mood
    Curmudgeon
    So basically they didn't want any part of pitching in to the Pens project from the start but now that they see what's going to happen and all the positives that the area will reap from it, they all of the sudden feel they deserve a piece of pie ?

    I'd say the hell with them too

  8. #8
    House of Steel
    Guest
    That is what I would show all the mayors of the Hill District.

  9. #9
    BlitzburghRockCity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Central PA.
    Posts
    54,682
    My Mood
    Curmudgeon
    A similar thing is happening in my area, they are building a new minor league stadium and park to house the new baseball we're getting. Many people are against it but Im sure when they see the revenue it brings in they'll want a slice of the pie too.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins Thread
    By PITT23 in forum Penguins Talk
    Replies: 239
    Last Post: 07-13-2013, 08:00 AM
  2. Planners approve final design for Penguins arena
    By TEEMONT in forum Penguins Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-08-2008, 07:01 AM
  3. City wants to relocate synagogue to build new arena
    By Friday133 in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-28-2007, 11:57 PM
  4. Groups unite to demand arena benefits
    By Friday133 in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 11:53 AM
  5. BREAKING NEWS:Penguins Arena Deal Could Be Reached Soon
    By SteelCityMan786 in forum Penguins Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-30-2007, 12:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •