And now you actually compare Sanders, Brown and Wheaton as being on the same level of receiving cores that Brady, Brees, Rodgers and the Mannings have had. You don't just sound ridiculous with that statement. You sound moronic.
What makes a # 1 WR is opportunity. One can't say Brown can't be true # 1 WR....I mean why can't he ? Why can't Sanders step up this season and finally show his physical abilities ? I mean New England had the best offense last season....and who was there # 1 WR ? A 5ft, 9, 185 Lb Welker who was a undrafted player who ran at best a 4.7 forty ? It the SYSTEM and a great QB that makes a offense move the ball. I don't care if we don't have another 1200 yard + WR, or 5 different WR/TE who combine for a average of 600-850 Yards each.
I mean what is the difference ?
Yes, some systems are designed to make receivers excel. But that doesn't mean you can plug ANY receiver into the slot and expect success. And that also doesn't mean that a great receiver can't make a bad system look good.
He also was undrafted, under 5ft 10 and 170 Lbs, and ran a steller 4.68 forty at Texas Tech. He also never had a season over 600 Yds receiving. And, he wasn't even on the Pats Radar, or any other teams Radar during the off season...if it weren't for us matching the offer for Sanders....Amendola wouldn't even be PLAYING....But he's so good according to you!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)