Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 43

Thread: 4-3 Anyone??

          
   
   
    Bookmark and Share
  1. #31
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,960
    Quote Originally Posted by TarlsQtr View Post
    Sacks are right up there with TOP for most overrated stats.

    Points against is the stat that really matters for a D.
    Sacks means you're putting pressure on the QB. Pressure on the QB leads to turn overs. It's not a coincidence that we pressured the QB yesterday and came up with 3 turn overs.

  2. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    3,363
    My Mood
    Ratbirds
    Obviously sacks are a great thing but are not as important as some think.

    2011- Rams led league in sacks (55), 25th in scoring D, 29th in INTs (10)

  3. #33
    @CoachZach_ Zachintosh66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Toledo, Oh
    Posts
    6,993
    My Mood
    Addicted

    My Social Networks

    Follow Zachintosh66 On Twitter Add Zachintosh66 on Facebook Add Zachintosh66 on Google+ Add Zachintosh66 on Linkedin Visit Zachintosh66's Youtube Channel
    Quote Originally Posted by NeilPatrickBanana View Post
    The lack of consistently being able to put pressure on with 4 is a huge huge huge problem
    We cant get pressure with 5 (2 OLB & 3 DL), how are we gonna get pressure with 4?


    This thread is ridiculous and shouldnt be thought about until DL quits. Some of you may not like that, but thats the truth of it. Then Coach Keith Butler has all but been told he is the heir-apparent for D Cord. Point is 3-4 isnt going anywhere...
    Last edited by Zachintosh66; 12-24-2012 at 09:11 PM.
    - Zachintosh66 (SCM 1135)

    2013 Record: 7-1. (TW 27-6 Rams) (TW 28-0 Raptors) (TW 33-12 Thunder) (TW 7-21 Seminoles) (TW 39-32 Cougars) (TW 23-15 Stealth) (TW 58-8 Force) (TW 31-28 Fury)


    [ T-Wolves Web | T-Wolves FB | My Xbox Live: zachintosh66 ]

  4. #34
    Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    And turnovers. Turnovers win ballgames. Ask the Browns. Or the Bengals. Or the Cowboys. Or the .....


    Quote Originally Posted by NeilPatrickBanana View Post
    The lack of consistently being able to put pressure on with 4 is a huge huge huge problem

  5. #35
    Starter LevonKirkland99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Redskins country
    Posts
    1,896
    why change to 4-3? is this going to give us more wins... ridiculous
    "HAIL TO PITT"

  6. #36
    Starter LevonKirkland99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Redskins country
    Posts
    1,896
    Quote Originally Posted by Zachintosh66 View Post
    We cant get pressure with 5 (2 OLB & 3 DL), how are we gonna get pressure with 4?


    This thread is ridiculous and shouldnt be thought about until DL quits. Some of you may not like that, but thats the truth of it. Then Coach Keith Butler has all but been told he is the heir-apparent for D Cord. Point is 3-4 isnt going anywhere...
    Speaking of LeBeau ( love the guy, but...) is he going to retire soon?
    "HAIL TO PITT"

  7. #37
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    4,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Zachintosh66 View Post
    We cant get pressure with 5 (2 OLB & 3 DL), how are we gonna get pressure with 4?


    This thread is ridiculous and shouldnt be thought about until DL quits. Some of you may not like that, but thats the truth of it. Then Coach Keith Butler has all but been told he is the heir-apparent for D Cord. Point is 3-4 isnt going anywhere...
    Relax dude, dont get your panties in a bunch. OP was just speculating if they changed, IF we had the personell

  8. #38
    Starter SnakeEyes43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    South Bend, IN
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by LevonKirkland99 View Post
    why change to 4-3? is this going to give us more wins... ridiculous
    It could fit with the personnel we have for the next few years, depending how we draft. But yes, all speculation.
    Bleeding Black and Gold since 86'

  9. #39
    Banned K Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In hell
    Posts
    18,999
    Quote Originally Posted by Flame View Post
    dunno.

    MLB TIMMONS
    ROLB SPENCE
    LOLB Woodley

    DE heyward
    DE ????
    DT mclendon
    DT hood
    heyward is not a 43 DE, he'd be a 43/cover 2 DT

    the best they could do would be Harrison at Mike, Timmons at SAM, Spence at WILL and woodley a LDE, draft an absolute stud RDE and play hood and heyward in the middle

    still wouldnt like it though

  10. #40
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,960
    Quote Originally Posted by LevonKirkland99 View Post
    Speaking of LeBeau ( love the guy, but...) is he going to retire soon?
    Wrong thread.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •