Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: 4-3 Anyone??

          
   
   
    Bookmark and Share

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    2nd String
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    703

    4-3 Anyone??

    I know this has been talked about before ... but That's what Tomlin came from , and that's what most of his drafting been players that seem to fit in the 4-3 better

    I agree with somebody I forget who said it , that maybe they thought DL was going to retire but he keeps sticking around, and there is no way that they can fire him

    Worilds and Woodley used to be DEs in college ...

    Spence is more of a 4-3 OLB ...

    Hood is more of a 4-3 DT

    the drafting since Tomlin has been more of a 4-3 Drafting

  2. #2
    Assistant Coach
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Palm Harbor, Fl
    Posts
    4,408
    I'm on board with phasing into a 4-3 base

    the "zone" blitz trickery is no longer effective... to get to the QB on a consistent basis you need skill/talent, not schematic trickery/design.

  3. #3
    Rookie Free Agent
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by NeilPatrickBanana View Post
    I'm on board with phasing into a 4-3 base

    the "zone" blitz trickery is no longer effective... to get to the QB on a consistent basis you need skill/talent, not schematic trickery/design.


    Why? The defense was dominant yeterday. And they still do not have the personal up front for a 4-3

  4. #4
    Assistant Coach
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Palm Harbor, Fl
    Posts
    4,408
    Quote Originally Posted by cbyzerman View Post
    Why? The defense was dominant yeterday. And they still do not have the personal up front for a 4-3
    18th in sacks 2012
    18th in sacks 2011

  5. #5
    Veteran TarlsQtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,536
    My Mood
    Ratbirds
    Quote Originally Posted by NeilPatrickBanana View Post
    18th in sacks 2012
    18th in sacks 2011
    Sacks are right up there with TOP for most overrated stats.

    Points against is the stat that really matters for a D.
    "If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -Jack Lambert

  6. #6
    Assistant Coach
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Palm Harbor, Fl
    Posts
    4,408
    Quote Originally Posted by TarlsQtr View Post
    Sacks are right up there with TOP for most overrated stats.

    Points against is the stat that really matters for a D.
    you missed the context

  7. #7
    Assistant Coach Real Deal Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ranclho Cucamonga,California
    Posts
    5,576
    Quote Originally Posted by TarlsQtr View Post
    Sacks are right up there with TOP for most overrated stats.

    Points against is the stat that really matters for a D.
    Disagree. Sacks are important because a lot of sacks translates into even more pressures. When we were top 3 in sacks every year, don't remember anyone saying the stat was overrated then.
    The Steeler way...is the only way.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,447
    Quote Originally Posted by TarlsQtr View Post
    Sacks are right up there with TOP for most overrated stats.

    Points against is the stat that really matters for a D.
    So when the offense holds the ball for 6 minutes to start a game the defense gets the credit?

  9. #9
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,873
    Quote Originally Posted by TarlsQtr View Post
    Sacks are right up there with TOP for most overrated stats.

    Points against is the stat that really matters for a D.
    Sacks means you're putting pressure on the QB. Pressure on the QB leads to turn overs. It's not a coincidence that we pressured the QB yesterday and came up with 3 turn overs.

  10. #10
    Head Coach LatrobePA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    THIS IS MY HOUSE BITCHES
    Posts
    12,301

    4-3 Anyone??

    Do we have the personal??
    "Happy Happy Happy"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •