we should have given the kid a chance to be at least the 3rd qb personally i think he would be better than Leftwich because he can run he was a 3 year starter at a&m Tannehill took over when they changed coaches.maybe they should have cut batch or lefty instead
Last edited by connecticutsteel; 11-13-2012 at 11:31 AM.
One old one should have been sent to pasture....
We need one young QB backup.
Keeping a young QB on the roster to develop is a reasonable position. However, if he was here there should be NO WAY Johnson starts against the Ratbirds this week.
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -Jack Lambert
Well if the coaches thought Johnson was good enough to make the team then he would still be on the roster....How hard could have been to beat out Chucky Batch?....lol No the Steelers shouldn't have kept Johnson but they do need to invest a draft pick in a young QB to groom.........
One old one should have been sent to pasture....
We need one young QB backup.
Agreed, soft batch should of been sent packing.Originally Posted by coldrolled
"Happy Happy Happy"
I THINK HE AT LEAST EARNED A SPOT ON THE PS
he'll be back... Leftwhich isnt mobile and will ge nailed shortly and Batch will get hurt his first quarter he plays (china doll charlie)
You would think Lefty should do okay in this offense. Short passes get the ball out of his hands ASAP. I Hope...
- Zachintosh66 (SCM 1135)
2013 Record: 3-0. (TW 27-6 Rams) (TW 28-0 Raptors) (TW 33-12 Thunder)
umm no he signed with the sacramento mountain lions of the ufl he is under contract
Lefty is worse then Batch.
Lefty is immobile and takes 15 minutes to throw a pass from his windup up passing motion. I think we have a better chance to win with Batch. And that's not saying much.
The Steeler way...is the only way.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks