So, in one thread Dwyer is the second coming of Walter Payton based on 2 runs against the second team defense. In this thread, Peter King is an idiot (I agree on this part) for basing his opinion on 17 or so plays by Adams and the the 1st team OL.
A little intellectual consistency would be nice.
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -Jack Lambert
neither do we (yet)Peter King doesn't think much of the Steelers O-Line
- Zachintosh66 (SCM 1135)
2013 Record: 3-0. (TW 27-6 Rams) (TW 28-0 Raptors) (TW 33-12 Thunder)
Today, August 14th, on the Colin Cowherd show, Peter King called Mike Adams a turnstile and said his performance was embarrassing.
Anyone wants to hear it, you can pod cast Cowherd show. I'm glad he did that. Just going to make Adams work that much harder.
The Steeler way...is the only way.
He almost sounds like a Steelers fan. What a ninny. LOL
Attila Mongolian Steelernut's IP Address is 178.98.112.098
You are either being purposely obtuse or you read everything in a literalist fashion like a nine year old. I'll let you decide which is the case.
Are you denying that there were several posters (in two different threads) proclaiming Dwyer the obvious choice over Redman based on his two runs against the Eagles second string defense? Are you denying that there are several posters in this thread (some likely the same) chiding King for judging Adams and the Steelers OL on a larger sample size (17 or so plays)? Does that strike you as intellectually consistent or as people looking through rose colored glasses?
SteelCitysFinestXL got it. Why can't you?
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -Jack Lambert
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks