I think the obvious pick for one is LA but the second is a bit tricky cause you could easily go to Toronto or but that's Canada and they have there own league.Oklahoma or New Mexico are solid choices The New Mexico Diablos would be a cool name or the Oklahoma Tornados .Then you gotta wonder if New York could support a third franchise.the brooklyn Bandits perhaps they could play in a dome so new york could host a super bowl ? what do you think?
NY IS hosting the Super Bowl in 2014. And as a former New Yorker, I do not think the locals would take to a new team. They are pretty much decided on the Jets or Giants. As to your other question, I would say San Antonio and Memphis if we are omitting L.A.
I don't want to see the NFL expand anymore.......32 teams is enough but LA will get another team but I do think moving a team like the Jags or another team would be the best option......
Cleveland deserves an NFL franchise don't ya think?
"Today, I'm officially retiring a Pittsburgh Steeler. And as much as I will miss football, my teammates, coaches and everything about the game, I don't want to play it in any other uniform. The black and gold runs deep in me, and I will remain a Steeler for life."--Hines Ward
Ouch! :-)Originally Posted by Raleigh Steel
Why does everyone want a team in LA ? The Rams and Oakland couldn't make it there .
It's no fun when the rabbit has the gun
I don't want a team in LA and I don't want the NFL to expand....Just saying I do think that LA will have an NFL team again.....
I think they could retract: Jacksonville.
I don't want a franchise in LA but with Goodell at the wheel he will expand to get his longer schedule
The NFL wants a team in LA. Not everyone else. Its a big market so can see why. Still, they have had a couple chances already. I say give another city that has never had one a shot.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks