Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: NFL Owners approve new rule changes

          
   
   
    Bookmark and Share
  1. #1
    Head Coach LatrobePA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    THIS IS MY HOUSE BITCHES
    Posts
    12,833

    NFL Owners approve new rule changes

    Something tells me the Steelers Defense was in mind with this one:

    Link to Article here

    Rule changes unanimously approved Tuesday at an NFL owners meeting could have a chilling effect on defensive players.



    The league has further defined what constitutes a “defenseless position” to provide better player protection. There also are further restrictions on the ability to “launch” and level a defenseless player (i.e. leaving both feet prior to contact to spring forward and upward into an opponent or using any part of the helmet).

    Not only will there be a 15-yard unnecessary roughness penalty but the launching defender can be ejected from the game if the action is judged flagrant by the officiating crew.

    “There were too many hits that came in the past three years that were legal but not ones that we were comfortable the player who got hit had any opportunity to do anything to protect themselves,” said Atlanta Falcons president Rich McKay, who is head of the NFL’s competition committee.

    The league also announced plans for another safety initiative that will result in teams being fined if their players accumulate too many penalties for illegal hits. The NFL already fines teams if too many of their players run into off-field legal trouble under the personal conduct policy.

    The exact details of the new “club accountability” guidelines are still being formulated but NFL senior vice president Adolpho Birch expects implementation for the 2011 season (provided it’s played).

    “We’re trying to encourage clubs and coaches to teach the proper techniques and correct dangerous play on the field,” Birch said.

    The following hits on players in a “defenseless posture” are now illegal:
    • A player in the act or just after throwing a pass.
    • A receiver attempting to catch a pass or one who has not completed a catch and hasn’t had time to protect himself or hasn’t clearly become a runner. If the receiver/runner is capable of avoiding or warding off the impending contact of an opponent, he is no longer a defenseless player.
    • A runner whose forward progress has been stopped and is already in the grasp of a tackler.
    • A kickoff or punt returner attempting to field a kick in the air.
    • A player on the ground at the end of a play.
    • A kicker/punter during the kick or return.
    • A quarterback any time after a change of possession (i.e. turnover).
    • A player who receives a “blindside” block when the blocker is moving toward his own end-line and approaches the opponent from behind or the side.

    Prohibited contact against a player in a defenseless position was further defined as “forcibly hitting the neck or head area with the helmet, facemask, forearm or shoulder regardless of whether the defensive player also uses his arms to tackle the defenseless player by encircling or grasping him.” It is also illegal to lower the head and make forcible contact with the top/crown or forehead/”hairline” parts of the helmet against any part of the defenseless player’s body.

    The latter provision does not prohibit incidental contact by the mask or helmet in the course of a conventional tackle.

    “This will permanently change the mentality, we think, of the defensive back trying to separate the ball in that you’ve got to lower your aim point,” McKay said. “The aim point has got to come into the numbers or below as opposed to above because you have to give that player an opportunity to defend themselves.”

    McKay said the “launching” rule likely wouldn’t result in an increase in player ejections and isn’t a point of emphasis for officials who already had the ability to issue disqualifications for hits that clearly cross the line.

    “We’ve always said that disqualification has to be open and obvious to you,” McKay said. “It’s hard at full speed to determine that act was so egregious that it deserves a disqualification. When in doubt, always throw the penalty (flag) and defer to the videotape to determine if a suspension or something else is necessary. We’re not changing that standard at all.”

    McKay said some of the inspiration to further bar “launching” stemmed from an alarming increase in the tactic at the college level.

    “I think we always look at ourselves where we want to set the standards and help people downstream,” McKay said. “We think we needed to make a point. You’re doing it as much to protect the guy getting hit as the guy doing the hitting. We have a couple of plays on videotape where the guy doing the hitting is getting hurt.

    “We just don’t like the fact that people have decided they can use their bodies, spring off the ground, lead with their head and expect to have a good result all the time.”
    The third approved rule change clarified protection of the quarterback. Hits to the head of a passer by an opponent’s hands, arms or other parts of the body will not be fouls unless they are forcible blows.


    “There are a number of plays this past year that many of us weren’t comfortable with (being) fouls,” McKay said. “We think we’ve got good video to show the referee what we want called and don’t want called. We think it will lessen penalties. We don’t think it involves player safety at all because if you do strike the quarterback with any force at all in the helmet, it is a penalty.”


    These rule changes were tabled at a March owners meeting because some teams were unhappy with the wording that was presented by the NFL’s competition committee. Teams approved the revamped measures by a 32-0 vote.
    Last edited by BlitzburghRockCity; 05-24-2011 at 06:11 PM.

  2. #2
    Rookie Free Agent bensshoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by LatrobePA View Post
    Something tells me the Steelers Defense was in mind with this one:

    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/n...ot-like-052411
    agreed!

  3. #3
    BlitzburghRockCity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Central PA.
    Posts
    54,682
    My Mood
    Curmudgeon
    • A quarterback any time after a change of possession (i.e. turnover).

    Once again the league is making sure they take care of their high profile, money guys. If you ask me on a change of possession, everybody is fair game. The Quarterback on the offense who is now trying to make the tackle is now a defender, in my opinion and at that time shouldn't be afforded any more luxuries than anyone else.

  4. #4
    @CoachZach_ Zachintosh66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Toledo, Oh
    Posts
    6,993
    My Mood
    Addicted

    My Social Networks

    Follow Zachintosh66 On Twitter Add Zachintosh66 on Facebook Add Zachintosh66 on Google+ Add Zachintosh66 on Linkedin Visit Zachintosh66's Youtube Channel
    A player in the act or just after throwing a pass.
    So what QB sacks are illegal now...
    - Zachintosh66 (SCM 1135)

    2013 Record: 7-1. (TW 27-6 Rams) (TW 28-0 Raptors) (TW 33-12 Thunder) (TW 7-21 Seminoles) (TW 39-32 Cougars) (TW 23-15 Stealth) (TW 58-8 Force) (TW 31-28 Fury)


    [ T-Wolves Web | T-Wolves FB | My Xbox Live: zachintosh66 ]

  5. #5
    The One And Only Phenomenal TJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    1,238
    My Mood
    Cool
    Wonder if they're supplying each team with their flags, or if the players have to supply their own.

  6. #6
    Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,024
    What bothers me about all of this is the officials. They failed to call any penalty whatsoever on many of the hits that were "fined" after the fact. That clearly indicates either the rules were so fuzzy they could not call them or they were afraid to. Either way, it dilutes and lessens the game. What a shame.

    I am surprised the referees have not been called to task over these missed calls. With new ones on the way, it is going to get worse.

    sigh . . . .

  7. #7
    Veteran jpele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Home of Yuengling Brewery
    Posts
    2,179
    My Mood
    Sunshine
    Thought there already was a sport called " track and field" ?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    It's no fun when the rabbit has the gun

  8. #8
    Veteran connecticutsteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    southern connecticut
    Posts
    2,705
    My Mood
    Manic
    National fairy league you cant leave your feet thats a bit much you can't touch the kicker or qb between the lockout and this i might not watch anymore this is silly

  9. #9
    Starter Callax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    IN Heart of Steeler Nation!!
    Posts
    1,278
    My Mood
    Ratbirds
    Too bad they could not "interpret" that rule when Miller got his lights turned off by the Balt. Felons!!!
    Oakland, Where Careers Go To Die!!!!!



    http://myxilplik.mybrute.com

    http://tironne.mybrute.com

  10. #10
    Starter SnakeEyes43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    South Bend, IN
    Posts
    1,338
    Silverback said it best:

    “ I'm absolutely sure now after this last rule change that the people making the rules at the NFL are idiots. ”

    -- Steelers LB James Harrison on his twitter account

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6583638
    Bleeding Black and Gold since 86'

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Rule bearing name amuses Steelers' Ward.
    By Stlrs4Life in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 05-10-2009, 05:54 PM
  2. Overtime rule change...
    By Dean Denton in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 01-08-2009, 11:07 PM
  3. 2007 NFL rule changes
    By Stlrs4Life in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-16-2007, 09:52 PM
  4. Jets Seek Loan From NFL
    By Steelerlyn in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-20-2006, 02:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •