Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: The business of being Bill Cowher.....

          
   
   
    Bookmark and Share
  1. #1
    SA's Bouncer
    DIESELMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Brandenburg, Ky.
    Posts
    7,492
    My Mood
    Addicted

    The business of being Bill Cowher.....

    Fans see wins and losses as the benchmarks measuring team and coaching success. Their goal is to see their team win games – its not financial – its purely emotional.




    However, owners have different perspectives. Yes, the want to win. But first and foremost is team revenue, team profit and team valuation. The organization is a business first, a sports team second.

    And coaches understand this – they understand that their actions have a bottom-line effect on the businesses they are expected to run and how that team is ultimately valuated.

    And over the past five years, only three teams in the NFL have seen their team valuation grow more than the Pittsburgh Steelers' – New England’s at 124%, Seattle’s at 102% and Indianapolis’ at 100%. Dallas, Denver, Baltimore, Washington, Miami – they have all grown at a lesser rate than Pittsburgh (88% over the past five years).

    Pittsburgh is now valuated at $880 million – up $332 million since 2001 alone.

    Furthermore, only two teams have seen their revenue grow faster as well over the past five years. Pittsburgh’s has grown by 72% - from $109 million to $187 million. Only Denver (80%) and New England (95%) have shown greater growth.

    What do you attribute this growth to?

    Winning. The teams at the top of the growth lists win, pure and simple. No teams experienced more success over the past five years than New England, Seattle, Indianapolis and Pittsburgh.

    Yet, how does that tie back to coaches and what Bill Cowher, for example, should earn?

    And there’s the rub.

    Cowher obviously understood his value was much greater than simple wins and losses – he saw the growth numbers and obviously understood his direct impact on them. But, what do those growth numbers mean for an owner’s reciprocity to his coach?

    To Paul Allen and Seattle, it meant $8 million for head coach Mike Holmgren after losing to Cowher in the Super Bowl. But despite a 2005 operating income of $36.5 million (over $23 million more than Seattle’s), the Rooneys seemed ill-prepared (or just plain reticent) to give away 11% of that operating income in a four million dollar raise for Bill Cowher to give him the reportedly asked-for $7 million salary. Perhaps in part due to the fact that operating incomes are so volatile in the NFL due to the effects of the myriad ways teams address contracts to overcome salary cap limitations, the Rooneys felt seven million was simply too much.

    At the end of the day, Cowher saw his impact on the team’s growth, the rewards others in very similar positions got for similar successes, and simply made a decision to ask for what he felt he was worth. Unfortunately, that was more than the Rooneys would ultimately give.

    But it’s understandable how Cowher got to his number of seven million. The operating income allowed for it, the growth he brought to the team was top five in the NFL – he earned it. And it was less than a man he just beat in the Super Bowl.

    However, it’s also apparent that Cowher played the system well. Due to NFL rules, he can resign for the time remaining on his contract (just one year) and become a “free agent” again in 2008, where he’s almost certain to make his eight million or more. What’s one year out of work to a man set to make seven-plus million per year, and who’s made millions already? Cowher made a business decision – take nothing now for the gamble of earning more later. NFL rules are set up to allow freedom from his contract only one year after his resignation – and Cowher used that rule to his advantage.

    In the end, the Rooneys gambled too - making a business decision of their own, that they can find an equally capable coach for less money than Cowher demanded to carry on Pittsburgh’s profitable and winning ways. Perhaps, factored in, was the cost of losing valuable assistants like Grimm and/or Whisenhunt if Cowher were to stay.

    But ultimately, these decisions become financial ones – and ergo monetary risks. It’s obvious that, if nothing else, the Rooneys saw a greater financial risk in paying Bill Cowher $7 million than they did in replacing him.

    Which, in and of itself, seems to speak volumes about their thoughts on whether Cowher could maintain his outstanding performance in Pittsburgh going forward.

    By Ron Lippock
    For SteelCityInsider.com
    Posted Jan 6, 2007
    One way or another its about the money. I believe Cowher could've maintained his outstanding performance with the Steelers but I guess the Rooneys feel like nobody is worth that kind of money. The Rooneys have been in business a long time and know what they are doing. The Steelers will be fine.....


    If you don’t stand behind our troops.....Please feel free to stand in front of them!!!


    "Give me a 6 pack, half hour of rest and lets go play them again....We can beat them."
    --Jack Lambert

    "They say that when you're the champs, everybody will try to beat you. Well, I'm glad we're the champs, so bring 'em on, bring 'em all on. If we die, we ain't gonna die running. It's gonna be a fight."
    --Joe Greene

  2. #2
    BlitzburghRockCity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Central PA.
    Posts
    54,683
    My Mood
    Curmudgeon
    The Steelers are a popular team all around the world, and since BC has been there it's just been blossoming into something even more special than anybody could have predicted.

  3. #3
    AZ_Steeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    19,358
    I don't personally think it was Cowher that made the Steelers blossom he just kept a tradition going (IMO)

    Yes the Steelers are very popular all around the world, I talked to a guy about the Steelers this past summer while riding the Subway in Madrid Spain!

  4. #4
    SA's Biggest Fan
    SteelersWoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,901
    My Mood
    Stressed
    There are those who would've liked to think that money didn't influence his decision. But it was rumored, and like I said in an earlier post--a rumor is like smoke, and where there's smoke, there's fire, so I knew there had to be truth to it.

  5. #5
    SA's #1 Pirates Fan Tetris Champion Black@Gold Forever32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Michigan City, IN
    Posts
    12,977
    My Mood
    Mad
    Well money played some kind of factor and I don't care what Bill says it did. But I understand pro sports is a business. So I'm not mad at Cowher. Plus Cowher wasn't going to coach this team forever. So it was time for a change. Who knows it could of maybe gotten really ugly between Cowher and Art Rooney the II in a few years.

  6. #6
    Ambridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dale City, Virginia
    Posts
    1,212
    My Mood
    Angry
    Quote Originally Posted by Black@Gold Forever32 View Post
    Well money played some kind of factor and I don't care what Bill says it did. But I understand pro sports is a business. So I'm not mad at Cowher. Plus Cowher wasn't going to coach this team forever. So it was time for a change. Who knows it could of maybe gotten really ugly between Cowher and Art Rooney the II in a few years.
    There was a money factor for sure.

    There was a Steelers roundtable on Sportsbeat on FSN Pittsburgh on Friday Night(Ed Bouchette, Gerry Dulac, Paul Alexander and Stan Savran).......Ed Bouchette and Gerry Dulac both said there was clear and present money issue that came to a head back in August.
    Both Dulac and Bouchette were told by Cowher and those close to the situation that evidently Bill Cowher felt that there was "slight" by the Steelers particulary from Art Rooney II who didn't want to even come close to Mike Holmgren's salary in Seattle and that the best the Steelers were offering which was $6.5 million was going to come in the final years of the contract that was put on the table.

    They noted that there was a frosty tension between Bill Cowher and Art Rooney II during the press conference on Friday.



  7. #7
    Top 30 BBG7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    2,475
    Well as a fan, you can say that Bill is a jerk or you can say that the Rooneys are being cheap. Either way, we don't know everything and probably never will. Bill has been with us for 15 years, and in that time he has brought a DB trophy back to Pittsburgh. He does deserve compensation for those achievements if he stayed with the Steelers. However, the ROoneys seem to think they can carry on the continued sucess of the Steelers with someone else and for a lot less money. I would want more if I was in Cowher's shoes and I think all of us would (even though it's hard for us to think about it because he makes more than most of us could probably imagine) looking at it from his point of view, why should the cry baby in Seattle be making this much more than him and he hasn't done anything but lose a SB to Cowher. This article isn't even saying he wants to make 8 million he was actually asking for one million less than the Holmgren, and why shouldn't he have wanted that. He has given the Steelers 15 years and a SB. Oh well, it's over now and time to search for his replacement.

    sig made by K Train....Thank you!

  8. #8
    House of Steel
    Guest
    I am hearing things aren't going well between Cowher and Art Rooney II that it has become a cold day in hell between them two. I bet you any money that had a lot to do with Cowher retiring. I wonder what the hell happened between them two for this to evolve.

  9. #9
    Head Coach LatrobePA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    THIS IS MY HOUSE BITCHES
    Posts
    12,369
    I now feel it's all about the money! At first I thought no way, he just wants a break. But seeing how he just stepped down from HC that leads me to believe he'll hold out the 07' season in hopes of a huge contract in 08'.

    The thing that chaps my *** is, I personally feel he blew this season for us! Play calling lack of fire, he just wanted to get it over with as soon as possible to start his vac.!!

    Yea yea I know, he didn't cause the fumbles / picks, but he is in control and is responsible to make the changes needed to fixing the problem...
    Last edited by LatrobePA; 01-08-2007 at 10:00 AM.
    "Happy Happy Happy"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bill Cowher Addresses Rumors About His Future
    By AZ_Steeler in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-23-2007, 07:41 PM
  2. Say it ain't so, Bill ... How dare Cowher talk to Cleveland
    By BlacknGold Bleeder in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 08-22-2007, 11:14 PM
  3. Kaye and Bill Cowher return for a day at favorite charity
    By Stlrs4Life in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-15-2007, 03:12 PM
  4. Is Bill Cowher sabotaging the Steelers coaching decision???
    By Troyisabeast_43 in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-15-2007, 05:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •