ok. i've never really understood trading down for a draft pick. If the player you want is on the board and you have a high pick why not just take him then instead of trading down to attempt to get him?
ok. i've never really understood trading down for a draft pick. If the player you want is on the board and you have a high pick why not just take him then instead of trading down to attempt to get him?
so you can attain more picks later in the draft wile still getting the player you want early... just not too early
You also have to look at current salaries for rookies. The lower the player is selected the cheaper he is.
Trading down can be very beneficial for a team: as long as you get the right price. We all saw the Browns trade down a million times last year and almost everyone agreed that they didn't get much value for the trades. They traded their 5th overall pick for the Jets' first, a second and a couple of over the hill players on defense. They could have gotten a lot more. Then, they went and traded down two more times while getting the other teams' first rounders and each of their sixth rounders. They could have gotten a lot more and they didn't. It's all about the asking price that will determine if a team trades down or not.
Once a fan, always a fan.
--Andy
IMO the steelers work like this: They have about 10+ guys they like at #18 (this includes guys like Suh and Berry who are all but unreachable) people who they THINK have #18 overall VALUE. If nobody on their board is there at #18 they will assess the draft so far (runs on positions like OL/DL always do these days) They see what team offers what and trade back from there. Why draft a guy like Cody or Spikes at #18 if you dont have them rated that high!? Trade back to 22+ and take them where you think they are valued!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks