Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Mike Wallace or Nate Washington

          
   
   
    Bookmark and Share
  1. #1
    Draft Pick xxxsteelernation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    pittsburgh
    Posts
    412

    Mike Wallace or Nate Washington

    Is it just me or Mike wallaces rookie year is better than the whole steeler career of nate washington? I understand that there is always the sophmore slump. but it just seemed that Wallace came throught with the big catches when we needed them.

  2. #2
    steelersbabex25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    College Park, MD
    Posts
    12,055
    My Mood
    Addicted
    That's not even a question...at all. If you even begin to wonder whether you'd rather have Mike Wallace or Nate Washington you need to get your head examined. Mike Wallace is better than Nate Washington at everything, and he's just a rookie. This is just kinda dumb..IMHO, of course .

  3. #3
    K Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In hell
    Posts
    18,648
    nate washington was ok and the drafting of wallace was a direct replacement of nates straight line speed but its not even close whos better....but nate was an UDFA, his ceiling was never very high

  4. #4
    @CoachZach_ Zachintosh66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Toledo, Oh
    Posts
    6,993
    My Mood
    Addicted

    My Social Networks

    Follow Zachintosh66 On Twitter Add Zachintosh66 on Facebook Add Zachintosh66 on Google+ Add Zachintosh66 on Linkedin Visit Zachintosh66's Youtube Channel
    As much as I liked Nate (from the same hometown). Wallace will make more of an impact than Nate ever could have dreamed.
    - Zachintosh66 (SCM 1135)

    2013 Record: 7-1. (TW 27-6 Rams) (TW 28-0 Raptors) (TW 33-12 Thunder) (TW 7-21 Seminoles) (TW 39-32 Cougars) (TW 23-15 Stealth) (TW 58-8 Force) (TW 31-28 Fury)


    [ T-Wolves Web | T-Wolves FB | My Xbox Live: zachintosh66 ]

  5. #5
    Starter Callax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    IN Heart of Steeler Nation!!
    Posts
    1,278
    My Mood
    Ratbirds
    HANDS DOWN MW IS AND WILL BE BETTER!!!!

    Nate did pretty good for himself to build himself up from being a UFA to a #3 WR.
    He must be thanking the stars for that FAT contract Tenn gave him, BUT HE IS NOT WORTH THAT KIND OF SCRATCH!!!!!

    Wallace is better from the day he steeped on Heinz Field. I recall only 1 pass he dropped that he should of caught.... I know he dropped more, but only 1 pass remember he dropped???
    I think that is pretty good.
    Nate dropped at least 1 pass EVERY GAME!!!!!!

    remember Pitt @ NYG, we were winning, Nate let an easy TD go thru his hands. He holds on to that and Pitt wins....

    FINAL ANSWER:
    Mike Wallace is FAR Superior to Nate Washington
    Oakland, Where Careers Go To Die!!!!!



    http://myxilplik.mybrute.com

    http://tironne.mybrute.com

  6. #6
    Starter cmerrifield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wilmore KY
    Posts
    1,662
    My Mood
    Impatient
    2008, Nate 40 receptions 631 yards,
    2009 Wallace 39 receptions 756 yards.

    That is Nate's best year vs. Wallace's rookie year. I think this one goes to Wallace

  7. #7
    Starter Callax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    IN Heart of Steeler Nation!!
    Posts
    1,278
    My Mood
    Ratbirds
    Quote Originally Posted by cmerrifield View Post
    2008, Nate 40 receptions 631 yards,
    2009 Wallace 39 receptions 756 yards.

    That is Nate's best year vs. Wallace's rookie year. I think this one goes to Wallace

    I think this simple statistic tells everything that needs to be said......
    FYI, how many Touchdowns did each WR get their prospective year???
    Oakland, Where Careers Go To Die!!!!!



    http://myxilplik.mybrute.com

    http://tironne.mybrute.com

  8. #8
    Starter cmerrifield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wilmore KY
    Posts
    1,662
    My Mood
    Impatient
    Quote Originally Posted by Callax View Post
    I think this simple statistic tells everything that needs to be said......
    FYI, how many Touchdowns did each WR get their prospective year???
    Washington had only three, but the year before that, he had six and Wallace had six.

  9. #9
    Draft Pick xxxsteelernation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    pittsburgh
    Posts
    412
    ok obviously it's not a contract year and rooney's don't really do transactions untill that comes up, do we offer wallace a longer contract. and what do we do with the dead weight like sweed and foster?

  10. #10
    Starter cmerrifield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wilmore KY
    Posts
    1,662
    My Mood
    Impatient
    There is no reason to offer him a new contract, especially since Holmes is still playing on his rookie contract. He cannot play for anyone else. If he continues to play well, he will get his contract and the starting job when Hines is done.

    What Foster are you talking about, if its Ramon, he is playing for league minimum, hardly dead weight, we can cut him next year if we need to without any real penalty.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Wallace, Lewis rookies to watch for Steelers
    By Captcoolhand in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-25-2009, 07:42 AM
  2. Nate Washington: Will He Stay or Will He Go
    By Captcoolhand in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 01-02-2009, 03:47 AM
  3. Still not sold on Nate Washington...
    By Troyisabeast_43 in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-29-2008, 01:08 PM
  4. Nate Washington getting comfortable
    By BlitzburghRockCity in forum Steelers Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-12-2006, 09:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •