I'd have kept Alameda Ta'Amu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Real Deal Steel

Again, none of us would be too upset if the Front Office used the first two picks on the linebacker positions.

---

Ravens, Pats are two teams that stick out with rookie defenders making plays. If we draft early for a LB they need to fn start!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LatrobePA

Ravens, Pats are two teams that stick out with rookie defenders making plays. If we draft early for a LB they need to fn start!

---

Ditto... Foote is not the answer. Didnt Worilds have more sacks than Harrison?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LatrobePA

Ravens, Pats are two teams that stick out with rookie defenders making plays. If we draft early for a LB they need to fn start!

---

Totally agree. We have to start getting the most out of the early draft picks.

Well, I guess I'm the one who has to always bring the clarity........

Y'all are crying about the Steeler D? The #1 ranked D year in and year out. #1 the last 2 years?

Steelers have 3 glaring weaknesses.: 1. No pass rush. 2. No running game. 3. The whole O- no QB or line.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by weakdraft

Well, I guess I'm the one who has to always bring the clarity........

Y'all are crying about the Steeler D? The #1 ranked D year in and year out. #1 the last 2 years?

Steelers have 3 glaring weaknesses.: 1. No pass rush. 2. No running game. 3. The whole O- no QB or line.

---

You bring clarity....funniest thing I ever read on these forums.....

You guys are retarded for being so willing to waste draft picks this year.
If the crop sucks, trade em for another year. Why take a borderline "okay" player with a #1 , #2, or #7 ?

We lost our identity in the Burg. Thugs persona non grata isn't too smart of a policy for a football team.