The debate was over when the FO told you with their money who's the better WR. They gave AB the money. Because he's the most complete WR. Dwyer will be given some money. Because he's the more complete RB.
Some people don't want to accept that but the Front Office and coaches look at the film and they analyze this before they decide to pay.
No matter how many times you say it, it's still a stupid argument.
Why the **** does every thread seem like it is about Wallace? It is a totally different topic, then all of a sudden, Wallace comes up. Stay on topic, dont use the contract situation as an excuse also.
Originally Posted by tburg68
Case in point: Adrian Peterson
If you switch Adrian Peterson with Mendy, would the front office be willing to let Peterson go? No. Because Peterson would clearly be the best RB on the ball club over Dwyer. Clearly.
But because Mendy isn't clearly better then Dwyer (and he isn't) they are willing to let Mendy go. It's stupid to think that if you switched out Peterson for Mendy, they would let Peterson walk. Did the Vikings let Peterson walk when Peterson had fumbling issues???? No...because he was THAT MUCH of a talent.
They are letting Mendy go because Mendy ISN'T AS TALENTED AS YOU THINK!
That's what you Mendy lovers fail to see. Overall, he's not that good. That's why he's on the bench in this crucial stretch run for us.
I'm going to leave it alone in this thread going forward. But actions speak loader then words and always has. The Front Office is telling you their opinions by their actions. They've benched Mendy...what does that tell you? They made Dwyer the starter..what does that tell you?
I'm not saying that Dwyer is the end all to be all RB. But he's the best we have on the roster right now in overall RB skills. Key world being...OVERALL!
Your argument really becomes crap when you use it in reference to Wallace.