PDA

View Full Version : A return to the running game gives Steelers reason to cheer



steelers4life66
01-02-2009, 06:33 PM
Is the "I" back in the burgh! God I hope so.
A conversation between two Steelers tackles in the locker room Sunday on the topic of their sudden return to the I-formation, the ground game and the productivity that went with it:
Max Starks: "It felt good."
Willie Colon: "It felt darn good."
Even defensive linemen like Casey Hampton, Aaron Smith and Brett Keisel enjoyed it.
"It was great!" Keisel said. "I was telling Aaron and Hamp on the bench, 'It's wonderful to sit here with you guys, to laugh and joke and watch those guys run the ball.'
"It was great to see Willie going again. I knew when he came in, he was ready to rock and roll."
Willie Parker planted the seed on Dec. 10 when he publicly complained about a lack of commitment to both the ground game and the use of a fullback. Sunday, the Steelers used fullback Sean McHugh in the I formation like never before this season. It produced Parker's second-best output of the season at 116 yards, the team's second-most rushing yards at 176 and three rushing touchdowns.
Most important, Sunday's performance on the ground in a 31-0 whipping of the Cleveland Browns might have sown more seeds for their playoff strategy on offense.
"Oh, yeah, that's something we're definitely going to have to utilize in the playoffs," said linebacker James Farrior, the defensive captain. "Everybody knows that in this locker room."
The drop-off in the ground game left the Steelers ranked 23rd in the NFL, their second lowest since they joined the AFC as part of the NFL merger in 1970. Parker stewed much of the season about what he felt was a lack of commitment to the running game, and the two-time Pro Bowl halfback took a public rebuke from coach Mike Tomlin when he spoke up three weeks ago.
Tomlin, though, told his team last Monday that they would "pound the ball" against the Browns, to the delight of most everyone.
"I feel we were able to line up and run the football at them," center Justin Hartwig said of Sunday's game. "That's what we talked about doing. We have to be able to do that no matter who we play against. It's a big positive for us pushing into playoffs."
It was evident that Parker was a mere spokesman for others who felt the same way when he bemoaned the lack of what he termed "Steelers football" that day.
"Hopefully the coaches will keep that in mind for the playoffs," Starks said. "We can run out of the I. Sure, it makes it more one-dimensional in some aspects, but it's successful."
The defense loves it because when it works, as it has so often for the Steelers through the years, and the drives are long, it keeps them off the field.
The question now is, can they return to the type of offense that effectively runs behind the I formation in the playoffs against defenses that will pose more problems than Cleveland's, which finished 28th in the league against the run?
"I guess they felt that's something we have to do and something we're going to need in the future, so we might as well start practicing it now," Farrior said.
Parker was as delighted as anyone and showed it when he fired the ball deep into the stands after his 34-yard touchdown run against the Browns.
"I love the I formation, I love the plays that were called," Parker said. "I knew we were going to pound the ball so you know I definitely love that, being a running back.
"Coach Tomlin told us Monday we were going to pound the football, and that's what we've been practicing all week, running the football. Just keep running, keep running and that's what we did, we just kept running it down their throat."
Among the run defenses the Steelers could see if they want to reach the Super Bowl are the best in the AFC: No. 2 Baltimore (behind the No. 1 Steelers) No. 3 Tennessee, No. 5 Miami and No. 6 San Diego.
"Will we know if Willie's words paid off or not?" Starks asked. "We'll see in the playoffs because that's what's going to matter and that's crunch time. Hopefully after [Sunday], Coach will feel a lot more confident puling the trigger in there."
Said Parker: "No matter what we do we can run the football. It's just a matter of doing it."
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08365/938441-66.stm

AZ_Steeler
01-02-2009, 07:02 PM
I doubt that it's back... the Steelers were just killing some clock in the Cleveland game. Besides, do we really want to gauge the Steelers running game against the Cleveland Browns? :nono:

Dean Denton
01-02-2009, 07:05 PM
I doubt that it's back... the Steelers were just killing some clock in the Cleveland game. Besides, do we really want to gauge the Steelers running game against the Cleveland Browns? :nono:
yeah, I say no. Everyone runs on the Browns, Begals, Texans. and these are the teams that we got off on. When we post those kinds of numbers against anyone of the teams in the playoffs, then I'll be on board. I'm with you AZ...

steelers4life66
01-02-2009, 07:19 PM
I doubt that it's back... the Steelers were just killing some clock in the Cleveland game. Besides, do we really want to gauge the Steelers running game against the Cleveland Browns? :nono:
The main reason I posted that article was It isn't just Willie that thinks the "I" is the way to go It's the entire team. I say you got to give it a chance in the play offs. I'm sticking to my guns you want the turn overs to stop you got to get that running game going. When we can't run the ball. Ben gets in trouble because he tries to do to much.:2cents:

yinzer
01-02-2009, 08:58 PM
it's NOT back. and what makes this thing worse is that the OL actually thinks it is.

Steelersfan
01-02-2009, 10:43 PM
I'm not sold on the running game either.

Parker's 4 playoff games (all SB year):
Cincy - 16 carries for 38 yds
Indy - 17 for 59
Den - 14 for 35
Seattle - 10-93 (9-18 minus 75yd run)

Bettis had a few yards to take some pressure off Parker this year too.

Last year with Davenport - 16 for 25

So, the past 5 playoff games the run game has sucked. Parker has basically had one long run in 4 playoff games. And those were years the run game was supposedly good.

steelers4life66
01-03-2009, 12:43 AM
it's NOT back. and what makes this thing worse is that the OL actually thinks it is.They're not saying its back they're saying we need to run out of the "I' formation. Thats where they've had the best results. I agree that single back formation is BS. Willie isn't built for that. It's not going to work.

popstaala
01-03-2009, 12:50 AM
the running game sucks until they are consistent... the o line think its back.. and that is a good thing for em... might give them an extra motivation to block downfield and to prove us all that its really back

steelers4life66
01-03-2009, 01:42 AM
the running game sucks until they are consistent... the o line think its back.. and that is a good thing for em... might give them an extra motivation to block downfield and to prove us all that its really back
I don't think they'll be consistent until they start running out of the "I" formation. That single back set is what sucks. Willie isn't built for that. He needs a blocker to follow.

popstaala
01-03-2009, 01:55 AM
I don't think they'll be consistent until they start running out of the "I" formation. That single back set is what sucks. Willie isn't built for that. He needs a blocker to follow.

good point... What happen to our I formation... havent seen that in a while.... please tell me arians is ****ing dumpass.

steelers4life66
01-03-2009, 02:12 AM
good point... What happen to our I formation... havent seen that in a while.... please tell me arians is ****ing dumpass.
I wish I had he's phone number. I'd been calling him along time ago. :lol:

BlitzburghRockCity
01-03-2009, 08:59 PM
That's what worries me too, that all of the sudden this team thinks we are magically back to being able to rush for 150 yds a game and take over whenever we feel like. It's almost like a false sense of security and if they try and do it next weekend how long will it be before they actually change things up if it doesn't work. How far behind would we have to get before they try something else because they think "oh we're back now with the running game" blah blah blah.

It was one good game rushing the ball against the worst defense in the league, my God we should be able to run against them..I'd be surprised if anybody couldn't do it.

LarryNJ
01-03-2009, 09:08 PM
I'm not sold on the running game either.

Parker's 4 playoff games (all SB year):
Cincy - 16 carries for 38 yds
Indy - 17 for 59
Den - 14 for 35
Seattle - 10-93 (9-18 minus 75yd run)

Bettis had a few yards to take some pressure off Parker this year too.

Last year with Davenport - 16 for 25

So, the past 5 playoff games the run game has sucked. Parker has basically had one long run in 4 playoff games. And those were years the run game was supposedly good.

**** man that is depressing. More Moore Please!

BlitzburghRockCity
01-04-2009, 07:07 PM
There's no reason we shouldn't be able to run on SD this weekend, none whatsoever. I know they are playing better right now and are hot after their big win on saturday but still. Parker and Moore need to come on in this game and give us all they got, our defense will do it's part but I look for Tomlin to really try and push the run now and see what they can do.

Iron City South
01-04-2009, 07:36 PM
Anybody watch the Ravins/Fins game earlier? ....

One name stands out when talking about my kind of running ...

Le'Ron McClain

Watching him abuse whoever dares to get in front of him actually made me jealous they have him and we don't.